5 Simple Statements About case laws on 493 crpc pakistan Explained
5 Simple Statements About case laws on 493 crpc pakistan Explained
Blog Article
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
It is usually important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual duration of service virtually violates the entire service composition being a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention from the legislation nor with the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents on the boy or Woman never approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they are able to Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and also the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally recognized conviction. Read more
The official court record is maintained because of the court of record. Copies of case file documents are certainly not offered around the search site and will need to be ordered from the court of record.
Generally speaking, higher courts do not have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the decreased courts.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed in an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all-around within the foster care system.
Because of this, basically citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Imagine it as calling somebody to inform them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in these-and-this sort of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving within the neighborhood trying to find their phone is likely to become more frustrating than it’s really worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court could interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it acceptable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair into the offender as well as the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should be capable of deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[4]
Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. here We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more